User talk:Kiroranke

February 2018

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

~ Rob₁₃^Talk 18:31, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kiroranke (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I made this accound long ago but did not use it. I think it got deleted because of inactivity, but after log in it was created again here. I can not edit because it is said that "18:31, 22 February 2018 Renamed user mou89p43twvqcvm8ut9w3 talk contribs blocked Kiroranke". Is this a error on my network? I am new and wanted to ask if someone can help me. An information was on my talk page to use this unblock element. I hope it is correct. Kiroranke (talk) 13:42, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Nyttend (talk) 01:30, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

No, that's not an error in your (home-)network. It means that an admin named "Renamed user mou89p43twvqcvm8ut9w3" asked the software behind Wikipedia to refuse editing from this account. Based on the name of the blocking admin I guess that he received a Courtesy vanishing later on so its impossible to ask him. Based on the block reason provided in you block log I (and you) can assume that he blocked you for Violating WP:SOCK. Pages that might be helpful:

Unbekannter z34-56r-ghf-aq2-d0r (talk) 13:23, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Per discussion at WP:AN, I'm rejecting this, since a checkuser (DeltaQuad) is confident that this account is a sockpuppet of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/WorldCreaterFighter/Archive. Nyttend (talk) 01:32, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]